Legal Opinion

Wisemore v. First Nat. Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 27, 1938No. 34567PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAND, Justice.

The plaintiff, Wilmer Wisemore, Agent of the Federal Health and Accident Company, seeks in this suit to recover damages in the sum of $8,000 against defendants, First National- Life Insurance Co., Inc., and J. L. Hill, its agent, in solido, because of certain alleged false, unfounded and slanderous remarks directed to plaintiff by defendant’s agent.

Defendant company tendered an exception to the jurisdiction ratione personae of the Fourth Judicial District Court, in which the suit was brought, and also exceptions of misjoinder of parties defendant, of misjoinder of causes of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DerbySupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  2. Williams v. Pullman Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
  3. Hypes v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  4. Gardiner v. ErskineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  5. Vicknair v. Daily States Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. LeBrane v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  2. Madison v. BoltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  3. Pack v. WiseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Wilson v. Capital City PressLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Taylor v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API