Legal Opinion

Fairchild v. Union Ferry Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1923PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

The plaintiffs are the receivers of the Atlantic Dock Company which owns a bulkhead and pier near the foot of Hamilton avenue, Brooklyn. The defendant ferry company, at the time in question, maintained a ferry from the foot of Hamilton avenue, Brooklyn, to the foot of Whitehall street, Manhattan, and in connection therewith had a ferry house, a bridge and rack. The ferry house and bridge are at the end of Hamilton avenue, and the ferry rack extends into the river as far as the dock company’s pier, and is located only a few feet from it. The plaintiffs sought injunctive relief requiring the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty of Brookhaven v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. People v. New York & Staten Island Ferry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Benson v. MayorNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Bond v. . WoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Commonwealth v. BallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Huguenot Yacht Club v. LionNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Beisheim v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Porter v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1957
  4. Tillman v. Lincoln Warehouse Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. In re the Estate of KirkbyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API