Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. Buell (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 2015No. 2014-0067Published

1Concurrence

Kennedy, J.,

concurring in the answers to the certified questions and concurring in the opinion in part.

{¶ 93} Respectfully, while I concur with the answers to both questions, I concur with the analysis only in part. With regard to the second certified question, I agree that the expiration of an unrecorded oil and gas lease and the *513reversion to the lessor is not a title transaction under R.C. 5301.56(B)(3)(a) of the Ohio Dormant Minerals Act (“ODMA”).

{¶ 94} As to the first certified question — whether a recorded oil and gas lease is a “title transaction” under the ODMA — I agree with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wachendorf v. ShaverOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State v. MoaningOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Spring Lakes, Ltd. v. O.F.M. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re BarnacleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  5. Stand Energy Corp. v. EplerOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API