Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. Buell (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Concurrence
Kennedy, J.,
concurring in the answers to the certified questions and concurring in the opinion in part.
{¶ 93} Respectfully, while I concur with the answers to both questions, I concur with the analysis only in part. With regard to the second certified question, I agree that the expiration of an unrecorded oil and gas lease and the *513reversion to the lessor is not a title transaction under R.C. 5301.56(B)(3)(a) of the Ohio Dormant Minerals Act (“ODMA”).
{¶ 94} As to the first certified question — whether a recorded oil and gas lease is a “title transaction” under the ODMA — I agree with the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wachendorf v. ShaverOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. MoaningOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Spring Lakes, Ltd. v. O.F.M. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re BarnacleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
- Stand Energy Corp. v. EplerOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.