Combined Metals Reduction Co. v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceWolfe, Justice
I concur in the result. That the provisions of the “lease” in the case of National Tunnel & Mines v. Industrial Commission, 99 Utah 39, 102 P. 2d 508, and the conduct of the parties as revealed in the evidence of that case made it a service relationship within the meaning of the tests provided by Sec. 19(j) (1), Laws 1936, Sp. Sess. c. 1, § 19(j) (1), as amended by Laws 1937, c. 43, elaborated on in the dissenting opinion in Fuller Brush Co. v. Industrial Commission, 99 Utah 97, 104 P. 2d 201, I have no doubt. Further elaboration will be found in the Columbia Law Review, Vol. XLI, No. 6, p.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Fuller Brush Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- National Tunnel & Mines Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- Halsell v. First National Bank of CowetaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925