Legal Opinion
Martin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 11, 2018No. 2017-2224PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mayer, Circuit Judge.
*1359 Hugh Martin, Sandra Knox-Martin, Kirkland Jones, Theron Maloy, and Sherilyn Maloy (collectively, "the Inholders") appeal the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing their claim alleging a Fifth Amendment taking as unripe. See Martin v. United States , 131 Fed.Cl. 648 (2017) (" Federal Claims Decision "). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The Inholders own patented mining and homestead claims inside the boundaries of the Santa Fe National Forest. See id. at 650 . In 2011, the Las Conchas Fire caused widespread destruction of vegetation within the forest. J.A.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bioparques de Occidente, S.A. de C v. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Red Sun Farms v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Dunn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Graves v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Grill v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.