Legal Opinion

Krueger v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 27, 1992No. 90-4042CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

This contract dispute is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction. For the reasons stated herein, the defendant’s motion is granted, and the plaintiff’s complaint will be dismissed.

Facts

This case concerns a dispute over a procurement contract and fourteen purchase orders between the plaintiff, Robert E. Krueger, and the Defense Construction Supply Center (DCSC).1 On July 7, 1986, the DCSC requested bids for the manufacture of twenty-seven test fixtures for discharge valves. Mr. Krueger, in a letter dated July…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Kirby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  4. Dawco Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  5. Vera Rogers Jones, the Estate of Ada Rogers Graham, and the Estate of Hattie Davis Rogers v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frymire v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  2. Renda Marine, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. M.E.S., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Spodek v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  5. Brisbin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API