Legal Opinion
Reinhart v. City of Schenectady Police Department
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided February 10, 2009No. 1:05-cv-630PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
GARY L. SHARPE, District Judge.
1. Introduction
Kelly Reinhart (“Reinhart”) filed this consolidated civil rights action alleging that Schenectady Police Detective Robert Glasser (“Glasser”) and jail matron Diane Updyke (“Updyke”) violated her Fourth Amendment rights by, respectively, causing her arrest and prosecution, and by seizing her brassiere. 2 (See Compl., Dkt. No. 1; see also 42 U.S.C. § 1983.) She also alleges companion state claims based on her Fourth Amendment theories, and a state claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress. Lastly, she alleges…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- 5 Borough Pawn, LLC v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- 5 BOROUGH PAWN, LLC. v. MartiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Cain v. County of Niagara, New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
- Fink v. CatalanoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023