Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Golden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 24, 1993No. 1920703PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Faith Golden, seeks a writ of mandamus to issue directing the Circuit Court of Lee County to permit Golden's discovery of alleged fraudulent acts against others by the defendant, Dr. Samuel G. Townsley, Jr.; to allow her expert witness to testify; and to allow her second amendment to her complaint. Golden has sued Townsley, alleging, in pertinent part, that he had engaged in a scheme to defraud. The matters she seeks discovery of relate to acts as to others, purportedly similar to fraudulent acts that Golden alleges that Townsley committed as to her. The trial court has denied…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Alfab, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte IzunduSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Ex Parte BozemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  4. Benefield v. F. Hood Craddock ClinicSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mock v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Mobile Infirmary v. DelchampsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Ex Parte Northport Health Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. Cobb v. Union Camp Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  5. Ex Parte McColloughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API