Joseph Ozormoor v. T-Mobil USA, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
When Joseph Ozormoor experienced frustration with his T-Mobile cell phone plan — dropped calls, poor reception, mysterious charges on his monthly bill — he sued the company for more than $600,000 in damages. Enforcing an alternative-dispute provision in the service agreement, the district court compelled arbitration of Ozormoor’s claims, and the arbitrator denied them all. Ozormoor appeals. We affirm.
I
Ozormoor signed a one-year agreement with T-Mobile for cell phone service in November 2003. After the agreement expired, Ozormoor paid for service from month to month until…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Roberts v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sodexo Management, Inc. v. Detroit Public SchoolsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
- Kaki v. Tenet Healthcare CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021