Legal Opinion
United States v. Pope
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 9, 2001No. CR. WMN-00-470PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, 18 U.S.CApp. 2 (Paper No. 14). Upon a review of the pleadings and the applicable law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary and Defendant’s motion will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
On October 5, 2000, Defendant Vernon Pope was indicted by the Grand Jury for the District of Maryland. 1 Under this indictment, Defendant was charged with possession of two firearms in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) and possession with intent to distribute…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Alabama v. BozemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. David Brydie Mitchell, Jose Carlos Prado, Reinaldo Rabeiro, Robert Webster Cary, Iii, and John DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. IwuamadiDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1989
- United States v. AllenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. KelleyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Combs v. States Attorney For St. Mary's County, MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Ricky Munez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011