Legal Opinion
Cannon v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 20, 1969No. Nos. 65 Civ. 1223, 65 Civ. 3114PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BO.NSAL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in these two actions (moving plaintiffs) move, pursuant to Rule 23, F.R.Civ.P., for an order declaring that their respective actions may be maintained as class actions.1
The class which the moving plaintiffs seek to represent would consist of all those shareholders of Texas Gulf Sulphur Company (TGS) common stock (TGS stock) on April 12, 1964, who sold their stock, between April 12 and April 16 at approximately 10 A.M., in reliance on a press release issued by TGS on April 12, 1964 (the April 12 press release).
These Rule 23 motions were originally made…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Demarco v. EdensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Heit v. WeitzenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Marceline M. DONALDSON and Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. the PILLSBURY COMPANY Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Korn v. Franchard Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Miller v. Mackey International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Miller v. Mackey International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.