United States ex rel. Amato v. Commissioner of Immigration
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFEY, District Judge.
The relator is an alien. He was twice convicted in the New York State courts of crimes committed in this country after his last entry in 1921. The first conviction was in 1930 of second-degree burglary; the second in 1934 of petit larceny.
Throughout the deportation proceeding the alien was represented by counsel and *481his hearing was fair. The only questions under the applicable statute (8 U.S.C.A. § 155), therefore, are: (1) Did each crime mentioned above involve moral turpitude? (2) Was each sentence for one year or more? If both answers be in the affirmative, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Meyer v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- United States Ex Rel. Popoff v. ReimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- United States Ex Rel. Paladino v. Commissioner of ImmigrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- United States ex rel. Shore v. CorsiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mercer v. LenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- McNAUGHTONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1978
- United States ex rel. Dentico v. EsperdyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- BADERBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1980
- Quilodran-Brau v. HollandDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.