Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 21, 1989No. 01-89-1170-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAM BASS, Justice.

This appeal requires that we determine the eligibility of the appellee, Texas Senator James E. “Buster” Brown, to run for the office of Texas attorney general in the March 1990 Republican primary election. The parties agree that there are no disputed issues of fact, and that the sole question of law is whether the attorney general’s retirement benefits constitute an *316“emolument” of that office. If so, Senator Brown is barred from running for attorney general by our supreme court’s decision in Strake v. First Court of Appeals, 704 S.W.2d 746 (Tex. 1986).

This controversy…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strake v. Court of Appeals for the First Supreme Judicial DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. City of Houston v. Harris County Outdoor Advertising Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Spire v. Public Employees Retirement BoardNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Campbell v. KellyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Harris County v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. TEXAS a & M UNIVERSITY v. Bishop, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  3. Brown v. MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Jilani by and Through Jilani v. JilaniTexas Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API