Meyer v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAM BASS, Justice.
This appeal requires that we determine the eligibility of the appellee, Texas Senator James E. “Buster” Brown, to run for the office of Texas attorney general in the March 1990 Republican primary election. The parties agree that there are no disputed issues of fact, and that the sole question of law is whether the attorney general’s retirement benefits constitute an *316“emolument” of that office. If so, Senator Brown is barred from running for attorney general by our supreme court’s decision in Strake v. First Court of Appeals, 704 S.W.2d 746 (Tex. 1986).
This controversy…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strake v. Court of Appeals for the First Supreme Judicial DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Houston v. Harris County Outdoor Advertising Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Spire v. Public Employees Retirement BoardNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Campbell v. KellyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
- Harris County v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- TEXAS a & M UNIVERSITY v. Bishop, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Brown v. MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Jilani by and Through Jilani v. JilaniTexas Supreme Court · 1988