Legal Opinion
Hentsch Henchoz & Cie v. Gubbay
Utah Supreme Court
Decided August 6, 2004No. 20020683PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURRANT, Justice:
¶ 1 Appellants contest the district court’s denial of their motion to dismiss, arguing that venue is not proper in Utah due to a forum selection clause that provides for all actions to be brought in the British Virgin Islands. In light of appellants’ wilful defiance of the district court’s orders below, we refuse to consider the merits of the appeal at this time. Instead, we will stay the appeal in order to allow appellants time in which to comply with our instructions as outlined in this opinion. If appellants fail to comply, the appeal will be dismissed.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- National Union of Marine Cooks & Stewards v. ArnoldSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Adamson Et Ux. v. BrockbankUtah Supreme Court · 1947
- Tobin v. CasausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Greenwood v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Alioto Fish Co., Ltd. v. AliotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- NPEC LLC v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- Hentsch Henchoz & Cie v. GubbayUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- Vince Caccavale v. Ranger Team Building, LlcIndiana Court of Appeals · 2024