Legal Opinion

Cudjo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 8, 1926No. A-5487PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBessey, P. J.

King Cudjo, plaintiff in error, was convicted of the illegal possession of a still and mash fit for distillation. By verdict of the jury his punishment was fixed at a fine of $100 and confinement in jail for 90 days. From the judgment on this verdict he appeals.

The evidence upon which this conviction rests was procured by means of a search warrant issued upon an affidavit which was not sufficient to give the magistrate jurisdiction to issue it. A private residence is immune from search and seizure, unless a showing is made by sufficient affidavit that the residence or a portion of it is a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Buckley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Hamilton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Glass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Oliver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API