Legal Opinion

Holloway Construction Co. v. Oakland County Board of County Road Commissioners

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1996No. Docket No. 99357PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

The issue presented in this case is whether prejudgment interest on an arbitration award is statutorily required from the time the complaint was filed, when the parties later stipu*610lated to resolve their dispute by binding arbitration, and where the arbitrators did not award interest.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This appeal arises out of a construction contract dispute between a general contractor, plaintiff Holloway Construction Company, and defendant Board of County Road Commissioners of the County of Oakland. The parties entered into a contract in which Holloway agreed to resurface three…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Old Orchard by the Bay Associates v. Hamilton Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Sansone v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dawe v. Dr Reuven Bar-Levav & Associates, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Arbitration Between Kalawaia v. AIG Hawai'i Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. StephanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Ebasco Constructors, Inc. v. Ahtna, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Titan InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API