Legal Opinion

Moore v. Carr

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1896PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Barton Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel P. Steatton, Judge. (1) The chattel trust deed in evidence is not void * ‘for the reason that it shows upon its face that it is an instrument for the use and benefit of the grantor.’ Metmer v. Graham, 57 Mo. 404; Hubbell v. Allen, 90 Mo. 574; Brackett v. Harvey, 91 N. T. 214; Ford v. Williams, 24 N. Y. 359; Conkling v. Shelly, 28 N. Y. 360; Miller v. Lockwood, 32 N. Y. 293; Robinson v. Flliott, 22 Wall.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Barton Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel P. Steatton, Judge. (1) The chattel trust deed in evidence is not void * ‘for the reason that it shows upon its face that it is an instrument for the use and benefit of the grantor.’ Metmer v. Graham, 57 Mo. 404; Hubbell v. Allen, 90 Mo. 574; Brackett v. Harvey, 91 N. T. 214; Ford v. Williams, 24 N. Y. 359; Conkling v. Shelly, 28 N. Y. 360; Miller v. Lockwood, 32 N. Y. 293; Robinson v. Flliott, 22 Wall. (U. S.) 524; Adler v. Claflin, 17 Iowa, 89; Klien v. Katzenberger, 20 Ohio St. 110; Abbott v. Goodwin, 30 Me. 407. Private persons, as well…

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P. J.

This is an action of replevin. The .history of the case, briefly stated, is about like this:

J. J. Andrews, a merchant engaged in the sale of agricultural implements, buggies, etc., on September 2, 1893, executed and delivered a certain deed of trust to the plaintiff, Moore, conveying to the latter the *68agricultural implements, buggies, etc., in the store of the former, to secure a debt due to Kingman & Company, and also to secure the debts of certain other creditors therein named. The said deed of trust contained a clause providing that if either of said creditors “shall not extend, according…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brackett v. . HarveyNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Mitchell v. Bradstreet Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Hickman v. DillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Seger's Sons v. Thomas Bros.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Chandler v. WestMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kugler v. RyanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Silsby v. WickershamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Wilkinson v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. Donk Bros. Coal & Coke Co. v. KinealyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Vandeventer v. GossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API