Seger's Sons v. Thomas Bros.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Macon Circuit Court. — Hon. Andrew Ellison, Judge. (1) The bill of sale on its face is fraudulent in law and should have been so declared by the court. JElser ¶. Graber, 6 S. W. Rep. (Tex.) 560; Blum McBride, 5 S. W. Rep. (Tex.) 641; Oppenheimer v.. Haeff, 4 S. W. Rep. (Tex.) 562 ; McVeigh v. Baxter, 82 Mo. 518 ; Holmes v. Braidwood, 82 Mo. 610; Mey■berg v. Jacobs, 40 Mo. App. .128; Hanna v. Finley, 33 Mo. App. 645 ; Link v. Harrington, 41 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Macon Circuit Court. — Hon. Andrew Ellison, Judge. (1) The bill of sale on its face is fraudulent in law and should have been so declared by the court. JElser ¶. Graber, 6 S. W. Rep. (Tex.) 560; Blum McBride, 5 S. W. Rep. (Tex.) 641; Oppenheimer v.. Haeff, 4 S. W. Rep. (Tex.) 562 ; McVeigh v. Baxter, 82 Mo. 518 ; Holmes v. Braidwood, 82 Mo. 610; Mey■berg v. Jacobs, 40 Mo. App. .128; Hanna v. Finley, 33 Mo. App. 645 ; Link v. Harrington, 41 Mo. App.. 635. ■( 2) Plaintiff ’ s demurrer to the interpleader’s evidence •should have been sustained at the conclusion of his •case. The $750…
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
This is an action by attachment for balance on account, of $1,127.29, against “Thomas Bros.,” a firm composed of Morgan Thomas, Lot Thomas and T. L. Thomas, three brothers, and sons of John M. Thomas. The latter interpleaded for the goods attached, and the court below having rendered judgment for him, the plaintiffs appealed to this court.
The evidence on the part of the interpleader was in substance as follows : Morgan Thomas, Lot Thomas and T. L. Thomas, desiring to go into the mercantile business, applied to their father, John M. Thomas, for pecuniary aid and obtained from him a loan of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sexton v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- State ex rel. Robertson v. HopeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Elser v. GraberTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Strong v. SkinnerNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Oppenheimer v. M. Halff & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Goddard-Peck Grocery Co. v. McCuneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- R. L. McDonald & Co. v. HooverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- State ex rel. Mayer v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Alberger v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- First National Bank v. FrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.