Legal Opinion
Claim of Hoffman v. Chatham Electric Light, Heat & Power Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 4, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Under our ruling in Matter of Marhoffer v. Marhoffer (220 N. Y. 543) awards for injuries may not properly be consecutive.
The question of the application of subdivision 3-u of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67) is not before us on these appeals.
The orders should be affirmed with costs against the State Industrial Board and the questions certified answered in the negative.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Orders affirmed, etc.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Marhoffer v. . MarhofferNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mizrahi's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. v. MonahanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
- Nelson v. Service Oil Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Claim of Carolan v. R. Hoe & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Claim of Flicker v. Mac Sign Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.