Legal Opinion
Claim of Carolan v. R. Hoe & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 7, 1929No. In the Matter of the Claim of John Carolan, Respondent, against R. Hoe & Company and Another, Appellants. State Industrial Board, RespondentPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, P. J.
The accident occurred March 26, 1921. The claimant fell and sustained the following injuries: A fracture of the right clavicle and of the skull at the base, concussion of the brain, bleeding from ears and nostrils. General disability awards for short periods were made and paid and claimant returned to work in December, 1922, at reduced wages. On October 15, 1923, he was given a schedule award for forty per cent loss of use of the right arm, covering a period from March 26, 1921, to August 16, 1923; no appeal was taken and this award was paid. Two decreased earnings awards were made; one,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Claim of Cohen v. Ashford Plumbing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Claim of Hoffman v. Chatham Electric Light, Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Pinski v. Superior Fireproof Door & Sash Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Claim of Bernstein v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Carolan v. R. Hoe & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Claim of Edwards v. Maryland Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Claim of Freeland v. Endicott Forging & Mfg. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930