Legal Opinion

Tate v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 31, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to enjoin, and also to recover damages for the blocking of a "crossing" by the defendant's train near Norlina, N.C. In February, 1912, the defendant purchased 60 acres of land from W. R. Creed Co. In order to enlarge its yards at Norlina, and soon thereafter constructed five tracks across the same in pursuance of that purpose.

The plaintiffs, prior to the purchase of this land by the defendant, had a contract with said W. R. Creed Co. for handling timber on a 2,400-acre tract of land on the south side of the defendant's track. The planning mill of the plaintiffs to which the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Wilson v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Herndon v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. R. R. v. . GoldsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Raper v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pusey v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Harris v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Summerlin v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API