Legal Opinion

Schlussel v. Gerlach ex rel. County of Maricopa

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 5, 2016No. 1 CA-SA 16-0064Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWANN, Judge:

¶ 1 This special action presents the question whether timely renewal of an amended judgment more than five years after the entry of the original judgment is effective. We answer the question in the affirmative, and hold that the time to renew an amended judgment runs from the time that the amended judgment is entered. Such a renewal is effective as to all relief granted in the amended judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 In April 2009, the court entered a judgment against Mark E. Schlussel and in favor of Bentley Terrace Dillard (“the 2009 judgment”). Schlussel filed a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Title Insurance Co. of Minnesota v. Acumen Trading Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Estate of Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Arizona Security Center, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Britt v. SteffenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API