Legal Opinion

Moorhead Machinery/Westinghouse v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 3, 1994No. 4-93-0757WCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Slater

The employer, Moorhead Machinery/Westinghouse, appeals from an order of the circuit court denying its motion for discharge of an appeal bond filed pursuant to section 19(f)(2) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 48, par. 138.19(f)(2)). Employer also appeals from the denial of its motion for sanctions pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 137 (134 Ill. 2d R. 137). The claimant, Leonard Siddens, filed a cross-appeal from the denial of his motion for Rule 137 sanctions. We affirm the denial of both motions for sanctions and remand for a rehearing on employer’s motion for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Proctor Community Hospital v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Kennedy v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Voorhees v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Kennedy v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Nierman v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. HammerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API