Legal Opinion

State v. McGill

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 1, 2006No. 2004-442PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.

The defendant, Donald S. McGill, appeals a ruling of the Superior Court (Lynn, C.J.) barring him from impeaching a witness, Franklin McGill, with a prior felony conviction and with testimony regarding his mental health. We reverse and remand.

*814The record supports the following facts. On July 25, 2003, the defendant was with his adult nephew, Franklin McGill (the witness). The two were drinking beer in the defendant’s trailer and each had consumed enough to feel the alcohol’s effect when they began to argue. Although it is unclear who initiated either the argument or the ensuing physical…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. United States v. Edward Jimenez, Also Known as Big Eddie Paul SantivanezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. In re BazemoreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  5. State v. FicheraSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  2. State v. DeschenesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. State v. Kyree RiceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API