Legal Opinion
Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 13, 1991No. 90-18PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
500 U.S. 20 (1991)
GILMER
v.
INTERSTATE/JOHNSON LANE CORP.
No. 90-18.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 14, 1991.
Decided May 13, 1991.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
John T. Allred argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
James B. Spears, Jr., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Robert S. Phifer.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · WhiteJustice White
The question presented in this case is whether a claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 81 Stat. 602, as amended, 29 U. S. C. § 621 et seq., can be subjected to compulsory arbitration…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited35 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Snipes v. Dollar Tree Distribution, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Solorio v. ABC Phones of North Carolina, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021