Legal Opinion

Vollrath v. Central Life Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 29, 1926No. Gen. No. 8,002PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Crow

delivered the opinion of the court.

The suit below was assumpsit upon an insurance policy for $1,000, containing a clause for double insurance benefit in case of accidental death. The clauses of the policy pertinent to a disposition of the question presented for decision are:

“In event this policy becomes a recognized claim as a result of accidental death, the Company will pay double the face of the policy, subject to the conditions and privileges herein contained, and in accordance with the clause, ‘Double Insurance Benefit from Accid.6nta,l DgSiIjIi ^ *
“The Company…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Insurance Co. v. BoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Manufacturers' Accident Indemnity Co. v. DorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  4. Paul v. . Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Waters v. Merchants' Louisville InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1837

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rebenstorf v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  2. Kirk v. Financial Security Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Otey v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Prehn v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932
  5. Wolfe v. Order of United Commercial TravelersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API