Sturch v. Sturch
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
Christi Sturch appeals a divorce decree from Pulaski County Chancery Court. We affirm the Chancellor’s decision pursuant to Ark. Rule Sup. Ct. 4-2(b)(2) due to the appellant’s flagrantly deficient abstract.
Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(6) requires an abstract to consist of material parts of the pleadings, proceedings, facts, documents, and other matters necessary to an understanding of the question presented to the court. In this appeal the appellant’s abstract consists solely of a one-half page portion of the Chancellor’s divorce decree. From this abstract it is…
2Cited by5 opinions
- D. Hawkins, Inc. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Lee v. VillinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Baldwin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Bradford v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995