Legal Opinion

Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The plaintiffs were stockholders of Houde Engineering Corporation. Defendant is a bank. Each plaintiff started an action against defendant, asking damages for breach of a contract of agency or brokerage. The actions were consolidated and tried. At the close of plaintiffs’ proofs, the court granted defendant’s motion for a nonsuit, and dismissal of the complaints upon the merits.

It is the claim of plaintiffs that defendant, acting through a partnership known as Krauss & Company, composed of various of its junior officers, and which, when nominated by the bank, handled transactions of the sort…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heller v. PopeNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Doherty v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Rasmussen v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edward B. Marks Music Corporation v. FoullonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. In re the Accounting of MeyerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API