Legal Opinion

State v. Russell

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1933No. 7,077PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewaet

An information charging grand larceny was filed in the district court of Toole county against Howard Eussell, Sherman Baxter, and Orville Page. Eussell and Baxter were tried together and a jury found them guilty and fixed their punishment at one year each in the state prison.

The defendants were charged with larceny of certain automobile tires and accessories of the alleged value of $200, the property of J. L. Stein.

Eussell and Baxter have appealed from the judgment and from the court’s order overruling their motion for a new trial. The appeal was presented upon several specifications of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. EbelMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. RiggsMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. HillMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State v. HoodMontana Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HansenMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. KinghornMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Wibaux Realty Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State v. DeedsMontana Supreme Court · 1952
  5. State v. GatesMontana Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API