Legal Opinion · Dissent

Town of Wake Forest v. Medlin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1930Published

1Dissent

Clakkson, I.,

dissenting: The uneontradicted testimony in this action was to the effect: That the defendant-built his store building at the present location in 1905, and has ever since that time operated his business at that location, and during all that period has been engaged in the sale of gasoline at said place. He does not operate a filling station or a garage, but only has what is commonly known as a curb filling pump located beside the curb and drawing gasoline from an underground tank, all of the equipment being of the best approved and modern type. During all of the time of his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Crossman v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State v. . WhitlockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. City of St. Louis v. Edward Heitzeberg Packing & Provision Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. MacRae v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API