Legal Opinion

United States v. Harry Katzin

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 22, 2013No. 12-2548PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judge.

This appeal stems from the Government’s warrantless installation of a Global Positioning System device (a “GPS device” or “GPS tracker”) to track the movements of Appellee Harry Katzin’s van. Harry Katzin, along with his brothers Mark and Michael (collectively, “Appellees”), claims that attaching the GPS device without a warrant violated the Fourth Amendment. The United States Government (“Appellant” or “Government”) argues that: (a) a warrant is not required to install a GPS device; (b) even if a warrant were required, the police were acting in good…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. AguiarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Harry KatzinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  3. People v. LeFloreIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
  4. United States v. Erick D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Trevor RansferCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API