Legal Opinion
Fountain Hills Civic Ass'n v. City of Scottsdale
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 2, 1986No. 1 CA-CIV 8658PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Judge.
The City of Scottsdale (City), which was permitted to intervene below as a party defendant after the trial court made its decision on the merits, appeals from a judgment ordering the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to call an election pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-101.03 concerning the proposed incorporation of Fountain Hills. The City also appeals the trial • court’s order denying its motion for a new trial. We have jurisdiction of the appeal pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-2101(B) and (F)(1).
ISSUES
The appeal presents the following issues for our consideration: (1) whether a May…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hill v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- LeBaron v. CrismonArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Colquhoun v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Phoenix v. YarnellArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Rodney v. Arizona BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Falcon v. Beverly Hills Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Wilderness World Inc. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Arizona Water Co. v. City of BisbeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.