Legal Opinion

Falcon v. Beverly Hills Mortgage Corp.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 15, 1990No. 2 CA-CV 88-0330PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROLL, Presiding Judge.

Garnishors Sergio Grijalva Falcon and others (investors) appeal from the trial court’s order granting Lloyd’s of London (Lloyd’s) and Employers Reinsurance Corporation’s (ERC) motion to quash the investors’ writs of garnishment. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm as to ERC’s motion and vacate and remand as to the motion filed by Lloyd’s.

FACTS

Beverly Hills Mortgage Corporation (BHMC) conducted a mortgage banking operation in Tucson, Arizona. Ramon Campbell owned and was employed by BHMC. On December 1, 1985, BHMC obtained a primary bond policy from Lloyd’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Sandoval v. ChenowethArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Ronnau v. Caravan International CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Allison Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. Litton Systems, Inc. v. Shaw's Sales & Service, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keggi v. Northbrook Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. Falcon v. Beverly Hills Mortgage Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Bralko Holdings, Ltd. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Puget Sound Escrow Closers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. Mattei v. M.B.A., Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API