State v. Seven Thousand Dollars
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
CLIFFORD, J.
In this forfeiture case we focus on the connection that the State must establish between seized property and suspected future criminal activity to permit forfeiture of the property under N.J.S.A. 2C:64-1 to -9. The facts require us to determine if that connection is sufficient when the only evidence linking the seized money to illegal activity consists of drug paraphernalia and the money itself.
I
On May 25, 1988, at about 1:33 p.m., Police Officer Matthew Biebel stopped Ronald Durden for a motor-vehicle violation. As Officer Biebel…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fischer v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Globe Motor Company v. Ilya Igdalev(074996)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. LandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Jones v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. One 1990 Honda AccordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- 1995 CORVETTE VIN 1G1YY22P585103433 v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.