Legal Opinion
American Federation of Government Employees v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 8, 1996No. Civil A. 92-2184PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.
This Court is once again asked to define the limits as to what information the government may lawfully require its employees to provide about themselves. Plaintiffs, the American Federation of Government Employees (“AFGE”) and three individual Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) employees, challenge the legality of the government’s request for information and for authorization to collect information from third parties regarding many HUD employees. 1 Plaintiffs’ claims rest on both constitutional and statutory grounds.
I
Background
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- UNITED STATES of America v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Federation of Government Employees v. PerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996