Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Moore

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1926No. Civil No. 2541PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

John D. Johnson, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against B. E. Moore, Perry M. Ling, A. E. Weidman, Le Boy Anderson, Thomas B. Smart~ Paul IL Deming, Verde Syndicate Copper Company, a corporation, and Verde Extension Copper Company, a corporation. We will here inafter nse the word “defendants” as referring to the personal defendants only, unless the context shows clearly the corporations are meant to be included. An appearance was entered and a demurrer to the complaint filed, on the ground that it did not state a cause of action against defendants or any of them. The matter was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Duckett v. National Mechanics' BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  2. White v. ShermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. American Trust & Banking Co. v. BooneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. National Bank v. Watsontown BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Robinson v. . National Bank of New BerneNew York Court of Appeals · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marks v. I. M. Pearlstine & SonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  2. Bru v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  3. Independence Lead Mines Co. v. KingsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  4. Independence Lead Mines Co. v. KingsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  5. Phillips v. Yuma Trust & Holding Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API