Bru v. White
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
This action is based on stockholder’s liability arising out of ownership of stock in the insolvent Yuma Valley Bank, a banking corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Arizona. Howard H. Bru, the defendant stockholder, appealed from a judgment entered against him in the District Court for the amount of an assessment levied on 400 shares of stock of the Yuma Valley Bank, assertedly owned by him. Mary E. Bru, as special administratrix of the estate of said Howard H. Bru, has since been substituted as the appellant herein.
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Early v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Ohio Valley National Bank v. HulittSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Houghton v. HubbellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1899
- Davis v. StevensU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1879
- Washington Loan & Trust Co. v. AllmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.