Legal Opinion

Pinkston-Hollar, Inc. v. Big Three Welding Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 1964No. 16503PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

Our opinion in this case, filed under date of March 13, 1964, is withdrawn and the following- substituted therefor.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a plea of privilege. The plaintiff, Big Three Welding Supply Company, prevailed, in the matter of venue against defendant, Pinkston-Hollar, Inc., on the latter’s contention that subdivision or exception No. 5, “Contract in writing”, to Vernon’s Ann.Tex.St. Art. 1995, “Venue, general rule”, had application to its suit. The exception gives a plaintiff the right to sue a defendant in the county wherein he has…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. John Farrell Lumber Company v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. VanHuss v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Trans-South Hydrocarbons Co. v. Trinity Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Cranbrook Corporation v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Duval County Ranch Co. v. Alamo Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API