Legal Opinion

Bradley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 17, 2007No. PD-0887-07PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONCURRING STATEMENT

COCHRAN, J.,

filed a statement concurring in the refusal of the petition,

in which MEYERS, JOHNSON, and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined.

I concur in the Court’s refusal of discretionary review based on appellant’s failure to comply with the rules of appellate procedure and Degrate v. State. 1 From time to time, various members of this Court issue a reminder that petitions for discretionary review must set forth “grounds for review” stating how the court of appeals erred in the particular case, coupled with “arguments” specifically addressing that error and explaining its general…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arcila v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Degrate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Leal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. State v. ConsaulCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Salinas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Akin, William JamesTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Gulledge, Ashlee NicoleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Holman, Vivian MonroeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Sneed, David RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Stanley, AndriaTexas Supreme Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API