Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Taylor

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1975No. 2500Published

1DissentLockwood, Justice

An examination of the record leaves me extremely disturbed with the majority’s analysis of two important aspects of this case. The immense tragedy out of which this matter arose cannot negate constitutional safeguards which apply to all defendants alike.

CUSTODY

The majority casually disposes of the question of when Louis Taylor was taken into custody in two sentences in their section on “Voluntariness of Appellant’s Statements” by concluding that “there is *85substantial testimony to support the finding of the trier of fact.” The nature of this “substantial testimony” is not related to us in the…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API