Legal Opinion

Rose v. Howard

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1984No. WD 33936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURNAGE, Chief Judge.

This is a suit for specific performance of an agreement to assign Indian headrights. The trial court declined to order specific performance.

The contention now made is that the agreement should have been specifically performed because it was supported by a valuable consideration. Affirmed.

This suit was instituted by Joannie Barclay Grant Rose, Timothy Hall Dunn, and Mary Ann Dunn Thorngate against the executor of the estate of Joseph E. Schuetz. Joannie, Timothy, and Mary Ann are grandchildren of Dora Dunn Schuetz. Dora, an Osage Indian of ⅝ blood, was married first to Dr.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Empire Gas Corp. v. Small's LP Gas Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Walters v. CalderonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Stringer v. ReedMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Katz v. Danny Dare, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stone Motor Company v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  2. CIT Group/Sales Financing Inc. v. LarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. A.L. Huber & Son, Inc. v. Jim Robertson Plumbing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Hunt v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Bird v. White (In re White)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API