Legal Opinion
Fazio v. Hames
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 27, 1993No. 05-93-01035-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESUBMISSION OPINION
McGARRY, Chief Justice.
We are once again faced with questions raised by the application of an order of the Supreme Court, dated August 7, 19911 (the “Order”), concerning a pilot project for the courts of Dallas County implementing the use of electronic statements of facts for appeals to this Court. Before us are motions for leave to file one transcription of the electronic recording; for an extension of time to file the statement of facts; and for an extension of time to file the transcription of the electronic recording. For the reasons stated below, we grant the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Krasniqi v. Dallas County Child Protective Services Unit of the Texas Department of Human Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Riggs v. Tech/III, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Darley v. Texas Uvatan, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Mason v. Dallas County Child Welfare Unit of the Texas Department of Human Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jarrell v. SerfassCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Uptmore v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994