Davidson v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Criminal Court of Baltimore City. The case was submitted on an agreed statement of facts to the Court below, (Harlan, J.) sitting as a jury, who found the traverser guilty, and imposed upon him a line of fifty dollars; thereupon the traverser appealed. The case is further stated in the opinion of this Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBryan, J.
Davidson was indicted on the charge that he “unlawfully did engage in the plumbing business in the City of Baltimore, without having first received from the State Board of Commissioners of Practical Plumbing a certificate of competency.” The case was submitted to the Court on an agreed statement of facts. It appeared that the traverser was engaged in' the jslumbing business that he made contracts for furnishing all the necessary materials and doing all the necessary work in plumbing ; that he did not personally perform any of the manual work of plumbing, but employed other persons to do it,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Keller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1858
- Burgess v. PueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1844
3Cited by7 opinions
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Abbott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- People Ex Rel. State Board of Examiners of Architects v. Rodgers Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Tribble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Keenan v. TumaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.