Legal Opinion

Keenan v. Tuma

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 5, 1926No. Gen. No. 30,497PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Taylor

On September 29, 1924, the plaintiff, Keenan (who did business under the title of John J. Keenan & Co.), began suit in a fourth-class case in the municipal court of Chicago against the defendant, Tuma (who did business under the title of Tuma Brothers), for $650 for a balance alleged to be due for architect’s services rendered under a written contract, and upon a trial, without a jury, on February 20,1925, recovered a judgment in the sum of $500. This appeal is prosecuted by the defendant.

The statement of claim set forth what purported to be a letter in confirmation of an oral agreement made…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estate of Ramsay v. WhitbeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Crall & Ostrander v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  4. People Ex Rel. State Board of Examiners of Architects v. Rodgers Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State Electro-Medical Institute v. PlatnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ransburg v. HaaseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Pascal P. Paddock, Inc. v. GlennonIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Greenspan v. Third Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Ransburg v. HaaseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Board of Education of Ferguson Independent Graded School Dist. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API