Keenan v. Tuma
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Taylor
On September 29, 1924, the plaintiff, Keenan (who did business under the title of John J. Keenan & Co.), began suit in a fourth-class case in the municipal court of Chicago against the defendant, Tuma (who did business under the title of Tuma Brothers), for $650 for a balance alleged to be due for architect’s services rendered under a written contract, and upon a trial, without a jury, on February 20,1925, recovered a judgment in the sum of $500. This appeal is prosecuted by the defendant.
The statement of claim set forth what purported to be a letter in confirmation of an oral agreement made…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Estate of Ramsay v. WhitbeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Crall & Ostrander v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
- People Ex Rel. State Board of Examiners of Architects v. Rodgers Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
- State Electro-Medical Institute v. PlatnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ransburg v. HaaseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Pascal P. Paddock, Inc. v. GlennonIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
- Greenspan v. Third Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Ransburg v. HaaseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Board of Education of Ferguson Independent Graded School Dist. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.