Legal Opinion
State v. Debnam
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 24, 1975No. 35-133, CA 4728PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
Defendant was accused of violating ORS 166.-045(1) (a), which provides:
“(1) A person commits the crime of loitering if he:
“(a) Loiters in or near a school building or grounds, not having any reason or relationship involving custody of or responsibility for a student, or, upon inquiry by a peace officer or school official, not having a specific, legitimate reason for being there * *
Defendant’s demurrer to the complaint challenging the constitutionality of this statute was denied in district court. A writ of review was granted by circuit court and upon review the order was affirmed. ① On appeal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department of Multnomah County v. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Switzer v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
- Matter of D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- State v. YanceyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.