Legal Opinion

State v. Yancey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 7, 1978No. 77-1760, CA 8818PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

Defendant was charged with the crime of possession of gambling records in the second degree. Defendant filed a demurrer to the complaint asserting that the statute proscribing the activity is unconstitutionally vague and therefore violates due process. The district court sustained the demurrer and entered an order finding the statute unconstitutional.

ORS 167.132 provides:

"(1) A person commits the crime of possession of gambling records in the second degree if, with knowledge of the contents thereof, he possess any writing, paper, instrument or article:

"(a) Of a kind commonly used in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. United States v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. City of Portland v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gaffey v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Gaffey v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API