HD Brous & Co. v. Synthesys Secure Technologies, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The plaintiff HD Brous & Company, Inc. (“Brous” or the “plaintiff’) alleges that the defendant Synthesys Secure Technologies, Inc. a/k/a Synthesys Technologies, Inc. (“Synthesys” or the “defendant”) breached an agreement to pay for investment banking services that Brous provided to it. Synthesys now moves to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and on the ground of forum non conveniens. Alternatively, Synthesys moves to transfer venue to the Southern…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Duha v. Agrium, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Neil Bros. Ltd. v. World Wide Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Citibank, N.A. v. Affinity Processing Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Golden First Mortgage Corp. v. BergerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Duha v. Agrium, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.