Legal Opinion

Brantley v. Brantley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1959No. 34283PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

In a default divorce decree, which did not specifically mention, or award, alimony to the pláintiff wife, the defendant husband, Robert Brantley, was ordered by the divorce court on April 30, 1956, to pay debts of the marital community, totaling $202.59. He did not do so.

On January 24, 1957, at the instance of Lena Brantley, the plaintiff wife, a further order of the court was entered. This order, in effect, held that Robert Brantley was in contempt of court for failure to pay the aforementioned obligations. It ordered that he be arrested by the sheriff for King county, and be held in jail…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Decker v. DeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Bronson v. SyversonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. J. A. Burrichter & Co. v. ClineWashington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Holloway v. HollowayWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In Re the Marriage of YoungCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  3. Britannia Holdings Ltd. v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. In re the Marriage of CurtisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Daly v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API