Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Curtis

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 15, 2001No. Nos. 18480-3-III; 19208-3-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Dr. Phillip Curtis, Jr., and Roberta Phillips entered into a property settlement agreement. The agreement became part of the dissolution decree. Ms. Phillips *194hired a new lawyer and moved to vacate the property settlement before presentment of the decree. The court denied her motion. She appeals, and argues that the court should have applied the factors set forth in RCW 26.09.080 (considerations for the disposition of community property and liabilities) before accepting their negotiated property settlement.

Absent fraud, overreaching, or collusion, the courts will not set aside a property…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Decker v. DeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. In Re the Marriage of MaddixCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  3. Kinne v. KinneWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Peste v. PesteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  5. Baird v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of HammackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  2. Estate Of William Bremer v. Glen L. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Mary Ann Mccormick v. Timothy David KosnoffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. Tamara Lee v. Daniel BunchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API