Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert S. Gordon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 30, 2004No. 03-10322Published
1Opinion of the Court
393 F.3d 1044
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert S. GORDON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-10322.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted July 15, 2004.
Filed December 30, 2004.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED William J. Genego, Santa Monica, CA, for the defendant-appellant.
Kevin V. Ryan, San Jose, CA; Hannah Horsley, San Jose, CA; and David R. Callaway, San Jose, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Jeremy Fogel, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pfizer Inc. v. Government of IndiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.